Friday, June 25, 2004

If John Kerry becomes President of the United States, chances are Senator Joe Biden (D-DE) will have a position in the cabinet, either as Secretary of Defense or Secretary of State. Biden has spent a lot of time during the Bush presidency making himself the national security expert among Democratic hawks. When you listen to him, you can just feel the ambition. Biden in fact ran for president himself in 1988 and strongly considered another run for 2004.

If Biden heads up US foreign policy, watch the hell out. He'll be "progressive internationalism" on crystal meth.

With violence mounting by the day on the ground, next week's Nato summit in Turkey may be a final chance for President Bush to enlist greater international help to restore security in Iraq.

Despite the bomb blasts in Istanbul and Ankara yesterday, the White House insisted that the trip would go ahead, and Mr Bush continued lobbying alliance partners for assistance.

The President admitted a fortnight ago that with 16 of the 26 Nato members already contributing troops to the occupying force, no new Nato peace-keeping forces were likely. The administration is, however, trying to persuade allies to provide training and technical assistance to create a show of international support co-inciding with the formal 30 June handover of sovereignty. . . .

France and Germany have ruled out sending troops to Iraq, the idea pushed by the US, and backed by Poland, which wants, eventually, to scale down its military presence in Iraq. In the meantime, the Pentagon is fine-tuning plans to send more troops to boost the 140,000-strong US force in Iraq, if the security situation continues to worsen. . . .

Despite the refusal of France and Germany to send troops, Democrats are pressing Mr Bush to ask Nato to send a force of its own to Iraq. Joe Biden, the senior Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, accused Mr Bush of planning to "pull back" in Iraq after the transfer of sovereignty, leaving a security vacuum.

"We are playing into the hands of the insurgents," Mr Biden said. The Pentagon wanted to get US troops "out of harm's way," he said, while the Bush administration seemed to be "internally paralysed".
Kerry + Biden = more war in 2005 and a military draft to boot.


At 7:43 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm worried that Biden will be Aspen without the humor.

The plagiarism issue is probably too far back to make a difference, but you know it's gonna come up at the confirmation hearings. An appointed position would be a lot wiser for a new president.


At 11:45 PM, Blogger ploeg said...

Yes, and Biden can ask for the Sugar Plum Fairy to arrange troop transports on the Magic Train from the Big Rock Candy Mountain, too. It ain't gonna happen. You know it, I know it, Biden almost certainly knows it, maybe even somebody's clued Bush in on it.

Rule 12 of politics: when a candidate for office advocates an impossible position, this means that they are pandering to the voters. The issue is not with Kerry or Biden, but with the people who would vote for them. The issue is that those voters have not yet accepted that the situation is irredeemable.

Therefore the people to watch are not the candidates themselves, but the backbenchers (e.g., Gore). If the backbenchers realize that a change in course is in order, and if they can convince the voters of this, the leaders will follow.

At 11:58 PM, Blogger ploeg said...

I hasten to add that Gore in specific has not yet moved toward the get-out-now position. If it should come, it will come from his direction first.

Unless, of course, we never have such a discussion during this election cycle, and Kerry comes in, and finds that he is shocked, shocked! that Iraq is even worse than he thought. This is the advantage of assuming an impossible position. Unless you are a complete nutbag, it is simplicity itself to withdraw from it.


Post a Comment

<< Home